yeezy boost 350 by doing

Air travel regarded fastest modes of travelling in way too many. It enables you to reach any point on globe in a short while as compared additional modes of transportation. But at times passengers…

Smartphone

独家优惠奖金 100% 高达 1 BTC + 180 免费旋转




Classic Utilitarianism

Philosophy in 5 minutes

Source: Wikipedia

If you are faced with a decision and have a range of options available to you, which one should you choose? Let’s say, you are a doctor in a hospital and two patients are lying in front of you, both in need of the one ventilator that’s available: one is young and strong, just began his university studies before he suddenly fell ill. His prognosis is good: If he gets the ventilator, he will probably make it and have a long life afterwards. The other is an older man, now the president of a big computer company, a philanthropist supporting many charities, but his health is not so good. Even if he survives on this ventilator, he’ll eventually die from one of his other ailments, perhaps this year, perhaps next. There’s no way to know for sure. — What will you do? Who of the two should get the chance to live?

If we can agree to this, then it follows naturally that the best action would be the one that maximises the happiness of all who are concerned: those whom my decision will affect. This is what Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) called “utilitarianism”: the principle that we should aim to maximise “utility,” which is nothing else but “happiness over unhappiness and pleasure over pain” (Bentham).

But here the trouble begins. Obviously, my two patients are not going to agree on whose survival makes them happier. The one who survives will be happy, the other unhappy (and dead). So we’ll have to consider a few more factors. Their families, for example. Let’s say, the young one has a big family, who all love him, and they will be devastated if he dies. The older company president is an orphan, has never had any attachments, lives alone and cares only for his work. Now it seems easier to see where most happiness will be generated. But what if we also take the charities into account? What if we also count the users of the software that the president’s company is making? But…

Add a comment

Related posts:

Embracing Uncertainty Is The Key To Unlocking Your Potential

Just go outside and pick up today’s paper and the headlines will be screaming with news that let’s us know we are living uncertain time. Economic instability, global pandemic on the loose, politics…

Can Lenders and Investors both win with Collateralizing?

In addition we keep being reminded that the FED is raising rates a few more times this year, doesn’t want to print more money and actually plans to remove funds form the currency market. We are also…

The Significance of Product Backlog Refinement in Scrum Success

Product backlog refinement, or PBR, is an integral component of successful Scrums. This process of continuously reviewing product backlog items, to ensure that teams know exactly what to work on in…